This is a slippery slope in the pagan community. It is the start of nasty politics amongst Wiccans from the time Alex Saunders claimed to be a witch as well as other Gardnerian tradition folks, practising a mystery initiatory religion that was created in the 1950′s, and has become popularly embraced since then by many others. However, it seems like this discussion of who can use “wicca” and under what circumstances seems a little like people of the fruits all agreeing they are fruits, but the bananas are not apples and think they are most able to claim being a fruit, and while the apples are fruits, just not the banana type, are claiming to be fruit too, just not bananas, nor should they be….they obvious come from different roots.
But for some folks, the use and the claiming of the term Wicca for their practices and beliefs is challenged, just like my fruit analogy, by bananas who are not apples, and by apples who seem to be offended to be considered not similar to bananas, at least as a fruit is defined. I deliberately use my analogy of fruit here, because this is the logic used to defend how BTW, or British Traditional Wicca, is different from that which is not traced from Gardner, yet there can be no question that it has been the inspiration of most of the other traditions of Wicca that exist. While Gardner himself never intended Wicca to be accessible to the masses, the internet, books, and the disenfranchisement of people from the organized church and congregational religions of the book, all have contributed to the popularization and consumption of a set of beliefs and ideas that make up Wicca. Even Gardner himself wrote the book “Witchcraft Today”, which was the first book about modern Wicca I read.
But do they, the bananas, have an exclusive right to the term fruit? Like the sands of time, language is fluid in its meaning, and the meaning has been shifting since the time of Gardner. A BTW will claim that their group training makes those things special, but that seems to be more of the same Masonic logic of knowing the right handshake. Is there really an outer and inner court in Wicca? I would not know. Being a Druid for many years, I find this whole thing silly, because all these people are looking for something in Wicca, maybe finding it, decide to practice something in the name of Wicca for many years, feel just so slimed and looked down upon when a BTW person tries to explain the difference. So much of the meanings of the Charge of the Goddess, the Wiccan Rede, and other pieces of the ceremonies can be found on the internet, it is possible to come close to re-creating the experience, if that is the key difference. Maybe it is because Druidic history is so fraught with myths of various kinds, that claims of this and that make no difference. To be Druid means to be comfortable with the idea that legitimacy and authority come from your ability to claim the term Druid. Druids have a few different re-creations that the term has to be claimed by the person using it. Each Druid claims it in their heart. What kind of Druid am I? That is a question that only a lifetime of practice will answer. This is not to suggest that Druids of differing traditions agree on the the kind and type of Druid practises: they don’t, but for some reason, at the end of the day, Druids do not seem to have this ongoing issue with the use of the term Druid. Maybe that comes from the history of how British Traditional Druidry, which is more what I practice, and ADF/Celtic Reconstructionalist Druidism, came about simultaneously in America and Britain just around and a little after Gardner’s Wicca.
I would like to refer you to another blog on the internet, an this person has done a much better job of explaining the problem.
http://serpent77.wordpress.com/is-there-a-difference-between-wicca-and-witchcraft/
The part from the blog I will quote is this, as it is closer to my own opinion:
“I mean no disrespect to members of British Traditional Wicca (BTW) groups, but if they want to distinguish themselves from the myriad of newer traditions or beliefs that have sprung up, either in groups or among those seeking to study the Craft as a solitary practitioner, they should continue to refer to themselves as British Traditional Wiccans, The Wica, or by some other name that adds to the label ‘Wicca’ rather than seek to claim a monopoly they don’t have sole claim to. At one time, it was reasonable to be considered the only legitimate Wiccans in the world, since closed covens were the only source of knowledge for Wicca. Even today, seekers will not learn the rites and mysteries or have that particular instruction, training, or experience outside of BTW and such should never be lusted after outside of those traditions. They have worked hard to have and hold them. However, now with multiple books and information on the history of European Paganism and Witchcraft, it is quite possible for someone to learn about and come to the Craft on their own, guided and taught by the gods. Every effort should be made on the seeker’s part to do this as honorably and with as much knowledge as possible.”
At some point, I wonder if the exclusive claim can be made for Wicca? While that may be uncomfortable for a BTW Wiccan, it may be too late to claim an exclusive right to using the term for what their tradition is about. I think that Wicca as a religion is not bound to one tradition, and may have grown beyond what Gardner intended for it. What the future of Wicca’s development will be will be interesting to observe.
Peace and Blessings
Charlene